Lachenman v. stice

Author: xkfr

August undefined, 2024

WebStice , 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied . Lachenman owned a terrier, but other dogs that belonged to neighbors, the Stices, attacked and killed the terrier. The trial court determined Lachenman's damages would be limited to the terrier's purchase price and to veterinary bills. WebLachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 461 (Ind. App. 2005). Defendant Annette Holdings, Inc. d/ b/a TMC Transportation, Inc. paid and settled the Plaintiff’s claim for property damage …

Witham v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co. - casetext.com

WebLachenman owned a terrier, but other dogs that belonged to neighbors, the Stices, attacked and killed the terrier. The trial court determined Lachenman's damages would be limited … WebLACHENMAN v. STICE Email Print Comments (0) View Case; Citing Case ; Citing Cases . Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. ... 889 N.E.2d 823 - … glacier national park in december

Liddle v. Clark, 107 N.E.3d 478 Casetext Search + Citator

WebRead Imel v. Thomas, 585 N.E.2d 712, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database. All State & Fed. JX. Sign In Get a Demo Free Trial Free Trial ... Summary of this case from Lachenman v. Stice. See 1 Summary. Opinion. No. 71A03-9107-CV-201. February 10, 1992. WebMar 15, 2010 · THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL. REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA . JUDGMENT. Case No: 432/09. AKASH LACHMAN Appellant. and . THE STATE … glacier national park hiking loops

Indiana Cases Animal Legal & Historical Center

DTCI: Intentional infliction of emotional distress

WebLachenman, 838 N.E.2d at 457. The court found that even though the neighbors may have been negligent in failing to keep their dogs on leashes and otherwise failing to properly supervise their dogs, such actions did not constitute outrageous behavior as contemplated by the narrow definition adopted from the Restatement. Id. WebHis claimed damages were $335. See Appellant s App. p. 20. The measure of damages for the destruction of personal 4 property is the fair market value at the time of loss. … fuyoen\u0026someck chinese × koreanWebJul 23, 2024 · Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied. Lachenman owned a terrier, but other dogs that belonged to neighbors, the Stices, attacked and killed the … glacier national park house rentals

"WebMrs. Stice stated in her deposition that it was Lachenman's terrier which was the aggressor. For purposes of summary judgment, however, we must consider the facts in the light … " - Lachenman v. stice

Lachenman v. stice

INVMA Glad You Asked That - Indiana Veterinary Medical …

WebNov 30, 2005 · Sean T. LACHENMAN, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Chere Lachenman, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Mitchell STICE and Josephine Stice, Appellees … WebMay 30, 2003 · Lachenman v. Stice, No. 15A01-0503-CV-113. United States Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana November 30, 2005 ...this vicious propensity at the time of the alleged …

Did you know?

WebLachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 467 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). Criminal Theft/Conversion Indiana Code 35-43-4-2 defines the crime of Theft in relevant part as follows: WebJan 12, 2009 · Appellant's App. p. 190. On December 9, 2003, the Lindseys filed suit against DeGroot Dairy seeking to enjoin the dairy from further operation and for compensation for nuisance, negligence, trespass, criminal mischief, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. DeGroot Dairy filed a motion for summary judgment on September 17, 2007.

WebSimilarly in In Lachenman v Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Indiana.App. Ct. 2005), the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision as they found that the defendant’s conduct did not constitute outrageous behavior. Here, the plaintiff brought an action to recover veterinary costs and emotional distress against the owner of the dog that ... WebJan 31, 2024 · On February 2, 2024, J & M filed a Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. 2 [4] On March 18, 2024, the court held a hearing. On March 21, 2024, the court entered an order granting J & M's motion for partial summary judgment. The order states: 18. Here, Faye Hunter was not physically impacted.

WebLachenman v. Stice , 838 N.E.2d 451, 457 n.5 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). However, although intent is a required element, it is not enough that the defendant acted with an intent that is … WebJun 30, 2015 · Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 460 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. denied (2006). Therefore, we affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment in Appellees' favor on those claims. Section 2.2—Appellees are entitled to summary judgment on Bah's malicious prosecution claim.

WebJan 12, 2009 · Appellant's App. p. 190. On December 9, 2003, the Lindseys filed suit against DeGroot Dairy seeking to enjoin the dairy from further operation and for compensation for nuisance, negligence, trespass, criminal mischief, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. DeGroot Dairy filed a motion for summary judgment on September 17, 2007.

WebApr 30, 2009 · Lachenman v. Stice: 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind.App.) In this Indiana case, a dog owner whose dog was attacked and killed by a neighbor's dog, brought an action against the neighbor to recover veterinary bills and emotional distress damages. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment in favor of defendant … fuy green sweatpantsWebNov 30, 2005 · OPINION. SULLIVAN, Judge. Appellant-Plaintiff, Sean T. Lachenman, as the personal representative of the estate of Chere Lachenman ("Lachenman"), challenges the … glacier national park indian reservationWebLachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 461 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). Generally, when a person finds a lost dog, that person acquires good title as against all the world but acquires no title as … fuy little bears with wooden furnitureWebFeb 1, 2024 · Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind. 2005), another case cited by Merin, also generally supports the proposition that the measure of damages for a dog killed is … fuyoucheWebLachenman v. Stice: 838 N.E.2d 451 (Ind.App.) In this Indiana case, a dog owner whose dog was attacked and killed by a neighbor's dog, brought an action against the neighbor to recover veterinary bills and emotional distress damages. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment in favor of defendant-neighbor ... fuy logic induction motorWebLachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 457 n.5 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). In Branham, a plaintiff employee was sleeping at work during a break, and a co-worker asked a supervisor to take a picture of them. Branham, 744 N.E.2d at 519. In the photograph, the co-worker was standing by the plaintiff employee with his pants down and his hand held ... glacier national park in early mayWebthe fair market value of the animal); see also Lachenman v. Stice, 838 N.E.2d 451, 464 n.12 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (holding that the fair market value of a dog is not limited to its replace … fuyouxing